Documents de recherche

@article{Young2023,
title = {The rate of hepatitis C reinfection in Canadians coinfected with HIV and its implications for national elimination},
author = {Jim Young, Shouao Wang, Charlotte Lanièce Delaunay, Curtis L Cooper, Joseph Cox, M John Gill, Mark Hull, Sharon Walmsley, Alexander Wong , Marina B Klein; Canadian Coinfection Cohort Investigators},
doi = {10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103981},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-04-01},
journal = {Int J Drug Policy },
volume = {114},
number = {103981},
pages = {103981},
abstract = {Background: The World Health Organisation (WHO) has set targets for the rate of new infections as a way to measure progress towards the elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a public health threat. As more people are successfully treated for HCV, a higher proportion of new infections will be reinfections. We consider whether the reinfection rate has changed since the interferon era and what we can infer about national elimination efforts from the current reinfection rate.

Methods: The Canadian Coinfection Cohort is representative of HIV HCV coinfected people in clinical care. We selected cohort participants successfully treated for a primary HCV infection either in the interferon era or in the era of direct acting antivirals (DAAs). Selected participants were followed from 12 weeks after completing a successful treatment until the end of 2019 or until their last measured HCV RNA. We estimated the reinfection rate in each treatment era, overall and in participant subgroups, using proportional hazard models appropriate for interval censored data.

Results: Among 814 successfully treated participants with additional HCV RNA measurements, there were 62 reinfections. The overall reinfection rate was 2.6 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.2-4.1) /100 person years (PY) in the interferon era and 3.4 (95% CI 2.5-4.4) /100 PY in the DAA era. The rate in those reporting injection drug use (IDU) was much higher: 4.7 (95% CI 1.4-7.9) /100 PY and 7.6 (95% CI 5.3-10) /100 PY in the interferon and DAA eras respectively.

Conclusion: The overall reinfection rate in our cohort is now above the WHO target set for new infections in people who inject drugs. The reinfection rate in those reporting IDU has increased since the interferon era. This suggests Canada is not on track to achieve HCV elimination by 2030.},
keywords = {HCV Elimination, HCV elimination; HCV reinfection; HCV treatment; HIV-HCV coinfection; People who inject drugs, HCV reinfection, HCV treatment, HIV-HCV coinfection, People who inject drugs},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{C2022,
title = {Gaps in hepatitis C virus prevention and care for HIV-hepatitis C virus co-infected people who inject drugs in Canada},
author = {C, Laniece Delaunay; M, Maheu-Giroux; G, Marathe; S, Saeed S; V, Martel-Laferriere; C, Cooper; S, Walmsley; J, Cox; A, Wong A; MB, Klein; },
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395922000470?via%3Dihub},
doi = {10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103627},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-02-01},
journal = {International Journal of Drug Policy},
abstract = {Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) living with HIV are a priority population for eliminating hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a public health threat. Maximizing access to HCV prevention and treatment strategies are key steps towards elimination. We aimed to evaluate engagement in harm reduction programs and HCV treatment, and to describe injection practices among HIV-HCV co-infected PWID in Canada from 2003 to 2019.

Methods: We included Canadian Coinfection Cohort study participants who reported injecting drugs between 2003 and 2019 in Quebec, Ontario, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia, Canada. We investigated temporal trends in HCV treatment uptake, efficacy, and effectiveness; injection practices; and engagement in harm reduction programs in three time periods based on HCV treatment availability: 1) interferon/ribavirin (2003-2010); 2) first-generation direct acting antivirals (DAAs) (2011-2013); 3) second-generation DAAs (2014-2019). Harm reduction services assessed included needle and syringe programs (NSP), opioid agonist therapy (OAT), and supervised injection sites (SIS).

Results: Median age of participants (N = 1,077) at cohort entry was 44 years; 69% were males. Province-specific HCV treatment rates increased among HCV RNA-positive PWID, reaching 16 to 31 per 100 person-years in 2014-2019. Treatment efficacy improved from a 50 to 70% range in 2003-2010 to >90% across provinces in 2014-2019. Drug injecting patterns among active PWID varied by province, with an overall decrease in cocaine injection frequency and increasing opioid injections. In the most recent time period (2014-2019), needle/syringe sharing was reported at 8-22% of visits. Gaps remained in engagement in harm reduction programs: NSP use decreased (58-70% of visits), OAT engagement among opioid users was low (8-26% of visits), and participants rarely used SIS (1-15% of visits).

Conclusion: HCV treatment uptake and outcomes have improved among HIV-HCV coinfected PWID. Yet, this population remains exposed to drug-related harms, highlighting the need to tie HCV elimination strategies with enhanced harm reduction programs to improve overall health for this population.},
keywords = {drug injecting patterns, harm reduction, HCV Elimination, HCV treatment, HIV-HCV coinfection, People who inject drugs},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

@article{N2018,
title = {Previous incarceration impacts access to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment among HIV-HCV co-infected patients in Canada},
author = {Kronfli N and Nitulescu R and Cox J and Moodie E and Wong A and Cooper C and Gill J and Walmsley S and Martel-Leferriere V and Klein MB},
url = {https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30460791/},
doi = {10.1002/jia2.25197},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-11-01},
journal = {Journal of the International AIDS Society},
abstract = {Introduction: The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is far higher in prison settings than in the general population; thus, micro-elimination strategies must target people in prison to eliminate HCV. We aimed to examine incarceration patterns and determine whether incarceration impacts HCV treatment uptake among Canadian HIV-HCV co-infected individuals in the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) era.

Methods: The Canadian Co-Infection Cohort prospectively follows HIV-HCV co-infected people from 18 centres. HCV RNA-positive participants with available baseline information on incarceration history were included and followed from 21 November 2013 (when second-generation DAAs were approved by Health Canada) until 30 June 2017. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of time-updated incarceration status on time to treatment uptake, adjusting for patient-level characteristics known to be associated with treatment uptake in the DAA era.

Results: Overall, 1433 participants (1032/72% men) were included; 67% had a history of incarceration and 39% were re-incarcerated at least once. Compared to those never incarcerated, previously incarcerated participants were more likely to be Indigenous, earn <$1500 CAD/month, report current or past injection drug use and have poorly controlled HIV. There were 339 second-generation DAA treatment initiations during follow-up (18/100 person-years). Overall, 48% of participants never incarcerated were treated (27/100 person-years) compared to only 31% of previously incarcerated participants (15/100 person-years). Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates at 12 weeks were 95% and 92% respectively. After adjusting for other factors, participants with a history of incarceration (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5 to 0.9) were less likely to initiate treatment, as were those with a monthly income <$1500 (aHR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5 to 0.9) or who reported current injection drug use (aHR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.4 to 1.0). Participants with undetectable HIV RNA (aHR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.6 to 2.9) or significant fibrosis (aHR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2 to 1.9) were more likely to initiate treatment.

Conclusions: The majority of HIV-HCV co-infected persons had a history of incarceration. Those previously incarcerated were 30% less likely to access treatment in the DAA era even after accounting for several patient-level characteristics. With SVR rates above 90%, HCV elimination may be possible if treatment is expanded for this vulnerable and neglected group.},
keywords = {Direct acting antivirals (DAAs), Disparities, HCV Elimination, HIV-HCV co-infection, Micro-eliminiation, People in prison},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}